<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexual violence in the past by police and security forces against Tamil women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/index.php/archives/1149/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayan</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-15528</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-15528</guid>
		<description>What Sri Lanka needs is an Independant Police Commission, with power to punish the offenders of human rights.  But we cannot  expect any government, including Ranil&#039;s  UNP,  to appoint this volunterily. As the citizens of Sri Lanka are not capable of forcing the goverment to do this, the International community must force the Sri Lankan government to do this. Mr. Pakyasothy Saravanamuttu&#039;s efferts in this regards are much appreciated by the general public of Sri Lanka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Sri Lanka needs is an Independant Police Commission, with power to punish the offenders of human rights.  But we cannot  expect any government, including Ranil&#8217;s  UNP,  to appoint this volunterily. As the citizens of Sri Lanka are not capable of forcing the goverment to do this, the International community must force the Sri Lankan government to do this. Mr. Pakyasothy Saravanamuttu&#8217;s efferts in this regards are much appreciated by the general public of Sri Lanka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen.Eagle12</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-15235</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen.Eagle12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-15235</guid>
		<description>Don should read the Srilankan history first.
Sri Lanka is the name of the island earlier known as Ceylon and situated at the Southern extremity of the Indian Subcontinent, separated from it at its narrowest point by 22 miles of sea called the Palk Strait. 
It covers an area of 25,322 square miles almost the size of Ireland or Tasmania and has a population of 18 million. Both the Sinhala and the Tamil nations co-existed in the island for over 2,500 years, and shared the rule of the island separately. Population ratio is approximately 74% Sinhala speaking and 26% Tamil speaking: Of the Sinhalese 93 % are Buddhists and 7% Christians. Of the Tamil speakers, 60 % are Hindus, 28 % Muslims and 12 % Christians.
The sources of the national conflict in Sri Lanka are historical, economic, cultural &amp; religious. In the words of David Selbourne of Ruskin College, Oxford, it is &quot;a true national question, if ever there was one&quot;.
Both the Tamil People &amp; Sinhalese people are indigenous people of Sri Lanka. Early history records that they had their own monarchs and kingdoms. They were conquered by the colonial powers separately and in different periods in history. They existed as separate communities until the British brought them together in 1883 under a single administration (for the very first time in their long history).
The European Colonial Era
1505 - Arrival of Portuguese - They first occupied the low country Sinhalese areas in the south west of the Island.
1621 - Jaffna Tamil Kingdom fell to the Portuguese (more than a century later).
1656 - Dutch occupied areas which were under Portuguese control.
1802 - Treaty of Amiens - Dutch possessions ceded to the British.
1815 - The Sinhalese Kandyan Kingdom in the central parts conquered by the British, having annexed the Tamil Vanni Kingdom in the north.
1833 -The British unified the island based on the recommendations of Cole Brook - Cameron Commission (purely for administrative convenience).
1931 - Donoughmore constitution - State Council elected by Universal suffrage (the first people to exercise universal suffrage in Asia).
1947 - Soulbury constitution adopted &amp; general elections held for the parliament of Ceylon.
The Sinhala-Colonial Era
1948 - British grant independence under the Soulbury constitution.
The parliament, with its entrenched Sinhalese majority, legislates to disenfranchise Tamils of [recent] Indian origin who have lived there for generations and have always exercised their franchise. The Tamil people lost almost half of their representation in the parliament.
The state aided colonisation of Sinhalese people in Tamil areas promoted to annex Tamil homelands and further reduce Tamil representation in the parliament.
1956 - The Sinhalese Language was made the only official language by legislation, disadvantaging Tamil people in dealing with the state administration and denying them equal access to education and employment.
1957 - Bandaranaike - Chelvanayakam Pact between the Sinhalese Prime Minister SWRD Bandaranaike and Tamil leader SJV Chelvanayakam QC to meet some of the demands of the Tamil people.
1958 - The Pact was unilaterally abrogated by the Sinhalese Prime Minister to pacify the extreme elements among the Sinhalese Buddhists. (He is the father of the President of Sri Lanka Chandrika Kumaratunga (1995 - ) He was assassinated by a Buddhist monk for his pact with the Tamils in 1959.
1965 - Senanayake - Chelvanayakam Pact - entered into, with another Sinhalese Prime minister Dudley Senanayake, and was never implemented by the Sinhalese government.
1969 - The Privy Council in London directs the Supreme Court in Sri Lanka to review the constitutionality of the Official Language Act, since it violated s.29(2) the constitution.
1971 - The government responds by abolishing appeals to Privy Council. The Tamil people&#039;s only avenue to seek justice through independent judiciary came to an end.
1972- The new Republican Constitution was adopted and imposed on the Tamil people without their consent.
The only legal safeguard provided by the entrenched section 29(2) of the Soulbury constitution, described by the Privy Council in London that they &quot;represent the solemn balance of rights between the citizens of Ceylon, the fundamental condition on which inter se they accepted the constitution; and these are therefore unalterable under the constitution&quot;, was scrapped.
Tamil parties walked out of the constituent assembly. With this Tamil participation of the democratic process in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) came to an end.
1973 - Through a process of standardization the government restricts entry of Tamil students to universities and institutions of higher education. 
1974 - The 4th International Tamil literary conference in Jaffna was broken up by the police, where many died and several were injured.
1976 - All the main Tamil political parties unite under the leadership of SJV Chelvanayakam QC and at their First National Convention declare: 
&quot;The Convention resolves that the restoration and reconstitution of the Free, Sovereign, Secular, Socialist state of Tamil Eelam based on the right of self-determination inherent to every nation has become inevitable in order to safeguard the very existence of the Tamil nation in this country.&quot;
1977 - Historical mandate of the Tamil people - The Tamil people gave a clear mandate at the general elections to establish their sovereignty. The manifesto called for:
&quot;… in the general Election the mandate of the Tamil Nation to establish an independent, sovereign, secular, socialist State of Tamil Eelam that includes all the geographically contiguous areas that have been the traditional homeland of the Tamil-speaking people in the country.
&quot;The Tamil nation must take the decision to establish its sovereignty in its homeland on the basis of its right to self-determination. The only way to announce this decision to the Sinhalese Government and to the world is to vote for TULF. The Tamil-speaking representatives who get elected through these votes while being members of the National State Assembly of Tamil Eelam which will draft a constitution for the state of Tamil Eelam and establish the independence of Tamil Eelam by bringing that constitution into operation either by peaceful means or by direct action or struggle&quot;.
The Tamil resolution also called on 
&quot;The Tamil youth in particular to come forward to throw themselves fully in the sacred fight for freedom and flinch not till the goal of a sovereign socialist state of Tamil Eelam is reached&quot;.
(The Sinhalese Prime Minister of Sri Lanka from 1970 to 1977 was Mrs. Srimavo Bandaranalke the present Prime Minister and the mother of the President Chandrika Kumaratunge [1995 - ).
The Anti-Tamil Violence - The Tamil people have been subjected periodically to communal violence. There have been anti-Tamil riots and pogroms in 1956,1958,1977 and culminating in the 1983 massacres and holocaust.
Military occupation &amp; Police brutality - First in 1961 and then in 1974, 1979, 1981 and from 1983. Many historical monuments including temples and churches were destroyed. (Attested in two reports by the International Commission of Jurists, and in several other reports of independent international human rights organisations).
The armed struggle by the LTTE on behalf of the Tamil people arose as a rebellion against the tyranny of the Sinhalese state and its brutal repression of Tamil people. It is a just cause in pursuance of their democratic aspirations, and the historic mandate, and therefore is lawful.
1983 - Sri Lanka commenced arbitrary arrests and detention without trial, torture and rape, violence against women, summary executions of the Tamil people. The era of mass exodus of Tamil refugees internally and internationally begins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don should read the Srilankan history first.<br />
Sri Lanka is the name of the island earlier known as Ceylon and situated at the Southern extremity of the Indian Subcontinent, separated from it at its narrowest point by 22 miles of sea called the Palk Strait.<br />
It covers an area of 25,322 square miles almost the size of Ireland or Tasmania and has a population of 18 million. Both the Sinhala and the Tamil nations co-existed in the island for over 2,500 years, and shared the rule of the island separately. Population ratio is approximately 74% Sinhala speaking and 26% Tamil speaking: Of the Sinhalese 93 % are Buddhists and 7% Christians. Of the Tamil speakers, 60 % are Hindus, 28 % Muslims and 12 % Christians.<br />
The sources of the national conflict in Sri Lanka are historical, economic, cultural &amp; religious. In the words of David Selbourne of Ruskin College, Oxford, it is &#8220;a true national question, if ever there was one&#8221;.<br />
Both the Tamil People &amp; Sinhalese people are indigenous people of Sri Lanka. Early history records that they had their own monarchs and kingdoms. They were conquered by the colonial powers separately and in different periods in history. They existed as separate communities until the British brought them together in 1883 under a single administration (for the very first time in their long history).<br />
The European Colonial Era<br />
1505 &#8211; Arrival of Portuguese &#8211; They first occupied the low country Sinhalese areas in the south west of the Island.<br />
1621 &#8211; Jaffna Tamil Kingdom fell to the Portuguese (more than a century later).<br />
1656 &#8211; Dutch occupied areas which were under Portuguese control.<br />
1802 &#8211; Treaty of Amiens &#8211; Dutch possessions ceded to the British.<br />
1815 &#8211; The Sinhalese Kandyan Kingdom in the central parts conquered by the British, having annexed the Tamil Vanni Kingdom in the north.<br />
1833 -The British unified the island based on the recommendations of Cole Brook &#8211; Cameron Commission (purely for administrative convenience).<br />
1931 &#8211; Donoughmore constitution &#8211; State Council elected by Universal suffrage (the first people to exercise universal suffrage in Asia).<br />
1947 &#8211; Soulbury constitution adopted &amp; general elections held for the parliament of Ceylon.<br />
The Sinhala-Colonial Era<br />
1948 &#8211; British grant independence under the Soulbury constitution.<br />
The parliament, with its entrenched Sinhalese majority, legislates to disenfranchise Tamils of [recent] Indian origin who have lived there for generations and have always exercised their franchise. The Tamil people lost almost half of their representation in the parliament.<br />
The state aided colonisation of Sinhalese people in Tamil areas promoted to annex Tamil homelands and further reduce Tamil representation in the parliament.<br />
1956 &#8211; The Sinhalese Language was made the only official language by legislation, disadvantaging Tamil people in dealing with the state administration and denying them equal access to education and employment.<br />
1957 &#8211; Bandaranaike &#8211; Chelvanayakam Pact between the Sinhalese Prime Minister SWRD Bandaranaike and Tamil leader SJV Chelvanayakam QC to meet some of the demands of the Tamil people.<br />
1958 &#8211; The Pact was unilaterally abrogated by the Sinhalese Prime Minister to pacify the extreme elements among the Sinhalese Buddhists. (He is the father of the President of Sri Lanka Chandrika Kumaratunga (1995 &#8211; ) He was assassinated by a Buddhist monk for his pact with the Tamils in 1959.<br />
1965 &#8211; Senanayake &#8211; Chelvanayakam Pact &#8211; entered into, with another Sinhalese Prime minister Dudley Senanayake, and was never implemented by the Sinhalese government.<br />
1969 &#8211; The Privy Council in London directs the Supreme Court in Sri Lanka to review the constitutionality of the Official Language Act, since it violated s.29(2) the constitution.<br />
1971 &#8211; The government responds by abolishing appeals to Privy Council. The Tamil people&#8217;s only avenue to seek justice through independent judiciary came to an end.<br />
1972- The new Republican Constitution was adopted and imposed on the Tamil people without their consent.<br />
The only legal safeguard provided by the entrenched section 29(2) of the Soulbury constitution, described by the Privy Council in London that they &#8220;represent the solemn balance of rights between the citizens of Ceylon, the fundamental condition on which inter se they accepted the constitution; and these are therefore unalterable under the constitution&#8221;, was scrapped.<br />
Tamil parties walked out of the constituent assembly. With this Tamil participation of the democratic process in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) came to an end.<br />
1973 &#8211; Through a process of standardization the government restricts entry of Tamil students to universities and institutions of higher education.<br />
1974 &#8211; The 4th International Tamil literary conference in Jaffna was broken up by the police, where many died and several were injured.<br />
1976 &#8211; All the main Tamil political parties unite under the leadership of SJV Chelvanayakam QC and at their First National Convention declare:<br />
&#8220;The Convention resolves that the restoration and reconstitution of the Free, Sovereign, Secular, Socialist state of Tamil Eelam based on the right of self-determination inherent to every nation has become inevitable in order to safeguard the very existence of the Tamil nation in this country.&#8221;<br />
1977 &#8211; Historical mandate of the Tamil people &#8211; The Tamil people gave a clear mandate at the general elections to establish their sovereignty. The manifesto called for:<br />
&#8220;… in the general Election the mandate of the Tamil Nation to establish an independent, sovereign, secular, socialist State of Tamil Eelam that includes all the geographically contiguous areas that have been the traditional homeland of the Tamil-speaking people in the country.<br />
&#8220;The Tamil nation must take the decision to establish its sovereignty in its homeland on the basis of its right to self-determination. The only way to announce this decision to the Sinhalese Government and to the world is to vote for TULF. The Tamil-speaking representatives who get elected through these votes while being members of the National State Assembly of Tamil Eelam which will draft a constitution for the state of Tamil Eelam and establish the independence of Tamil Eelam by bringing that constitution into operation either by peaceful means or by direct action or struggle&#8221;.<br />
The Tamil resolution also called on<br />
&#8220;The Tamil youth in particular to come forward to throw themselves fully in the sacred fight for freedom and flinch not till the goal of a sovereign socialist state of Tamil Eelam is reached&#8221;.<br />
(The Sinhalese Prime Minister of Sri Lanka from 1970 to 1977 was Mrs. Srimavo Bandaranalke the present Prime Minister and the mother of the President Chandrika Kumaratunge [1995 &#8211; ).<br />
The Anti-Tamil Violence &#8211; The Tamil people have been subjected periodically to communal violence. There have been anti-Tamil riots and pogroms in 1956,1958,1977 and culminating in the 1983 massacres and holocaust.<br />
Military occupation &amp; Police brutality &#8211; First in 1961 and then in 1974, 1979, 1981 and from 1983. Many historical monuments including temples and churches were destroyed. (Attested in two reports by the International Commission of Jurists, and in several other reports of independent international human rights organisations).<br />
The armed struggle by the LTTE on behalf of the Tamil people arose as a rebellion against the tyranny of the Sinhalese state and its brutal repression of Tamil people. It is a just cause in pursuance of their democratic aspirations, and the historic mandate, and therefore is lawful.<br />
1983 &#8211; Sri Lanka commenced arbitrary arrests and detention without trial, torture and rape, violence against women, summary executions of the Tamil people. The era of mass exodus of Tamil refugees internally and internationally begins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shankar</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-15234</link>
		<dc:creator>shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-15234</guid>
		<description>things are getting a bit out of hand in srilanka. i don&#039; know whether this is an isolated case or a wider phenomenom of decay in society. the following article appeared today


  &quot;Oct 20, 2009 2:42 PM · People had beaten up two youths, who had allegedly abducted and raped a girl aged three years, and handed the duo over to police.

The incident had taken place in Bandaragama in the early hours of yesterday morning (Oct. 19).

The suspects had entered a house, snatched the sleeping little girl from her mother and taken her to a nearby well, where they had continually raped her.

Her father had been away at his workplace, and only the mother and the grandmother had been at home at the time, Moragahahena Police said.

Waking up, the mother had found the girl missing, and with the help of people of the area, had searched for and found her near the well.

The suspects aged 23 and 24 years - one of them a father of one - are said to be drug and alcohol peddlers.

They had also robbed the mobile phone of the girl&#039;s mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>things are getting a bit out of hand in srilanka. i don&#8217; know whether this is an isolated case or a wider phenomenom of decay in society. the following article appeared today</p>
<p>  &#8220;Oct 20, 2009 2:42 PM · People had beaten up two youths, who had allegedly abducted and raped a girl aged three years, and handed the duo over to police.</p>
<p>The incident had taken place in Bandaragama in the early hours of yesterday morning (Oct. 19).</p>
<p>The suspects had entered a house, snatched the sleeping little girl from her mother and taken her to a nearby well, where they had continually raped her.</p>
<p>Her father had been away at his workplace, and only the mother and the grandmother had been at home at the time, Moragahahena Police said.</p>
<p>Waking up, the mother had found the girl missing, and with the help of people of the area, had searched for and found her near the well.</p>
<p>The suspects aged 23 and 24 years &#8211; one of them a father of one &#8211; are said to be drug and alcohol peddlers.</p>
<p>They had also robbed the mobile phone of the girl&#8217;s mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surane</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-15225</link>
		<dc:creator>Surane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-15225</guid>
		<description>During the time the JVP was being suppressed, there were many incidents of rape too. They are the victims without a voice. It seems in a situation of war, where the law is unfortuntely silent the vulnerbale become the victims, namely the women and children. I would desist  from saying that these crimes are racially motivated. However, sex offences thrive in war situations because  the sex offenders have the best opportunities to commit these crimes. Women were sexually abused during World War 1 and 2 too. Hence, in these circumstances, it is not a new phenomenon and it will never be new phenomenon. When one uses a victim&#039;s ethinicity by saying a Tamil woman was raped or Sinhalese woman was raped we attract an additional motive based on race into it. Whether they be Tamil women or Sinhalese women and were raped we need to constructively find a way to give them a voice and bring the culprits to book. If not, all what we write here will be in vain and will  have no meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the time the JVP was being suppressed, there were many incidents of rape too. They are the victims without a voice. It seems in a situation of war, where the law is unfortuntely silent the vulnerbale become the victims, namely the women and children. I would desist  from saying that these crimes are racially motivated. However, sex offences thrive in war situations because  the sex offenders have the best opportunities to commit these crimes. Women were sexually abused during World War 1 and 2 too. Hence, in these circumstances, it is not a new phenomenon and it will never be new phenomenon. When one uses a victim&#8217;s ethinicity by saying a Tamil woman was raped or Sinhalese woman was raped we attract an additional motive based on race into it. Whether they be Tamil women or Sinhalese women and were raped we need to constructively find a way to give them a voice and bring the culprits to book. If not, all what we write here will be in vain and will  have no meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaluyaka</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-15110</link>
		<dc:creator>kaluyaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-15110</guid>
		<description>Many writers state that rape happens where there is war and it is done by the Armed forces.  I might like to add
that rape happens everywhere, and it happens more
where there is no law and order (Anarchy). 

It happened in New Orleans after Katrina hit the town and
people were living in that Dome.  Rape was committed in
Northern Australia (Darwin)  when cyclone Tracey hit that town.  This was committed by soldiers who was sent 
there to help the locals.

What about all those girls sent by the LTTE as suicide
bombers. Is it because their lives were cheaper and
dispensable. Why didn&#039;t diaspora open their big mouths
when scores of girls were sent to the front line while
VP and his little angels were swimming in a prestine 
pool. Serves them right to end up in a mud pool.  LTTE treated their own tamil girls like phoo.
At least now those girls can look forward for a future.

Further, what about in Tamil Nadhu when a girl is born,
some people choke them to death by putting too much
rice in their mouths.  I saw this story when I was in 
Australia in 60 minutes programme.  I am highlighting 
these facts to show everyone how tamil community 
treat their own women.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many writers state that rape happens where there is war and it is done by the Armed forces.  I might like to add<br />
that rape happens everywhere, and it happens more<br />
where there is no law and order (Anarchy). </p>
<p>It happened in New Orleans after Katrina hit the town and<br />
people were living in that Dome.  Rape was committed in<br />
Northern Australia (Darwin)  when cyclone Tracey hit that town.  This was committed by soldiers who was sent<br />
there to help the locals.</p>
<p>What about all those girls sent by the LTTE as suicide<br />
bombers. Is it because their lives were cheaper and<br />
dispensable. Why didn&#8217;t diaspora open their big mouths<br />
when scores of girls were sent to the front line while<br />
VP and his little angels were swimming in a prestine<br />
pool. Serves them right to end up in a mud pool.  LTTE treated their own tamil girls like phoo.<br />
At least now those girls can look forward for a future.</p>
<p>Further, what about in Tamil Nadhu when a girl is born,<br />
some people choke them to death by putting too much<br />
rice in their mouths.  I saw this story when I was in<br />
Australia in 60 minutes programme.  I am highlighting<br />
these facts to show everyone how tamil community<br />
treat their own women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCK</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14990</link>
		<dc:creator>TCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14990</guid>
		<description>Dear DBSJ,
Thanks for the clarification.

1. &quot;If the victims were all “Sinhala” there would have been a greater outcry.&quot; - I donot disagree with you. This too is racist and I think we should not promote this.

2. &quot;You are best advised to do nit-picking on headings elsewhere. For starters there are English newspapers that report according to ethnicity...&quot;
Again, I agree with you.
Once I wrote an email to Daily Mirror copying how DM &amp; Lankadeepa reported the same news report from the two ends of the racial spectrum. but nothing happened. 

Unfortunately only you takes time to publish the reader comments and then explain your stance. Most opt to just ignore.

3. I would have expected a person of your calibre to be concerned about the climate of impunity that allows such crimes against members of a minority community.

We are all concerned about the cliamte of inpunity. I never said these atrocities didn&#039;t happen. or they are justified. I am merely highlighitng something else. After all would any of us know if the Army didnt rape any Sinhala women in the 89-90 period? So if the report said &quot;there have been numerous reports of the rape and assault of sri lankan women by Army personnel, most of whome are Tamils, wouldnt it be more balanced?&quot;

5.  But the actuality is that the IDP’s are all Tamils.. - Is this true? Are&#039;nt there Muslims also amoung the IDPs?

6.  Yu are writing this blog and we are reading this for the same reason. Because we want to change things. So I choose to ignore the rude and confrontational language.

All I am saying is that if we want Sri Lanka to prosper and be the place we want it to be, I have to put my &#039;sinhalaness&#039; and a Tamil his/her Tmailness in the backburner and maybe eventually completely remove from the rational thinking spectrum.

It can come out when I want to sing, dance or read a book.

DBSJ RESPONDS:

I am sorry for the tone of my response. 

Much as I would like to put away ethnic consciousness and evolve a Sri Lankan identity the reality is different. As long as minority community people are being victimised on grounds of their ethnicity and the notion that the Sinhala &quot;Majority&quot; has greater rights to the Country prevails there can be no true nation building

Only a genuine process of reconciliation based on justice and equality can result in TRUE unity and amity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear DBSJ,<br />
Thanks for the clarification.</p>
<p>1. &#8220;If the victims were all “Sinhala” there would have been a greater outcry.&#8221; &#8211; I donot disagree with you. This too is racist and I think we should not promote this.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;You are best advised to do nit-picking on headings elsewhere. For starters there are English newspapers that report according to ethnicity&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Again, I agree with you.<br />
Once I wrote an email to Daily Mirror copying how DM &amp; Lankadeepa reported the same news report from the two ends of the racial spectrum. but nothing happened. </p>
<p>Unfortunately only you takes time to publish the reader comments and then explain your stance. Most opt to just ignore.</p>
<p>3. I would have expected a person of your calibre to be concerned about the climate of impunity that allows such crimes against members of a minority community.</p>
<p>We are all concerned about the cliamte of inpunity. I never said these atrocities didn&#8217;t happen. or they are justified. I am merely highlighitng something else. After all would any of us know if the Army didnt rape any Sinhala women in the 89-90 period? So if the report said &#8220;there have been numerous reports of the rape and assault of sri lankan women by Army personnel, most of whome are Tamils, wouldnt it be more balanced?&#8221;</p>
<p>5.  But the actuality is that the IDP’s are all Tamils.. &#8211; Is this true? Are&#8217;nt there Muslims also amoung the IDPs?</p>
<p>6.  Yu are writing this blog and we are reading this for the same reason. Because we want to change things. So I choose to ignore the rude and confrontational language.</p>
<p>All I am saying is that if we want Sri Lanka to prosper and be the place we want it to be, I have to put my &#8216;sinhalaness&#8217; and a Tamil his/her Tmailness in the backburner and maybe eventually completely remove from the rational thinking spectrum.</p>
<p>It can come out when I want to sing, dance or read a book.</p>
<p>DBSJ RESPONDS:</p>
<p>I am sorry for the tone of my response. </p>
<p>Much as I would like to put away ethnic consciousness and evolve a Sri Lankan identity the reality is different. As long as minority community people are being victimised on grounds of their ethnicity and the notion that the Sinhala &#8220;Majority&#8221; has greater rights to the Country prevails there can be no true nation building</p>
<p>Only a genuine process of reconciliation based on justice and equality can result in TRUE unity and amity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bose</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14984</link>
		<dc:creator>bose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14984</guid>
		<description>Dear kalujaka
Let not your heart to be troubled!  By knowing Who K.M.P was and what he uttered about Tamils only, I compared with K.Rajaratnam. Further, an average Rajaratnams(?)  won’t expressed in such a manner as  said in #74 and in #78.?
Again, If Kalujaka can raised  the question on behalf of  Rajaratnam , why can’t Mrs Clinton  voiced about the sexual abuse  in Sri lanka. This is a human rights issue and not a family issue? 
As per #76,Rajaratnam should understand , Tamil nadu is a state and not a country. Moreover, Toronto is a city where Sri Lankan Tamils are being settled in a considerable amount only. Let the Toronto based Tamils decide their future if such needs arises! 
If Toronto could be considered or to form a Little Eelam in Canada, why Tamils of Sri Lanka cannot consider same in a Sri Lanka. In addition, If Tamil Nadu being a state of Tamils, why can’t they consider for such model for Tamils in Sri Lanka?  
It does not mean I am  advocating  separatism or division. If Singhalese have their own destiny why can’t the Tamils decide theirs!  All depends on how they treat and live harmoniously with other communities.
#74 Secondly , Prabhakaran is the other side of Singhalese extremism  in away, to  Sarath fonseka or “Cinthanaya” Bros. in terms of the deeds!  Further, Prabhakaran is a bitter product due to the majority’s gross violations and continued denial of rights. Due to the negligence of the majority leaders in the past our beautiful nation has gone through such ordeal and a deadlock created among the communities. Separatism cry began from all these nonsense!
Leaders are fighting for their prosperity and luxuries, by pawning the innocents.  Not only Kalujaka but also and suthumenike , Naina marikkar and Thamibimuthu in the country are in constant panic due to extremism, terrorism, pogrom , genocide and bloody war. 

Totalitarian rule won’t last for long! History will repeat one day.
This is my reply to kalujaka on behalf of Rajaratnam .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear kalujaka<br />
Let not your heart to be troubled!  By knowing Who K.M.P was and what he uttered about Tamils only, I compared with K.Rajaratnam. Further, an average Rajaratnams(?)  won’t expressed in such a manner as  said in #74 and in #78.?<br />
Again, If Kalujaka can raised  the question on behalf of  Rajaratnam , why can’t Mrs Clinton  voiced about the sexual abuse  in Sri lanka. This is a human rights issue and not a family issue?<br />
As per #76,Rajaratnam should understand , Tamil nadu is a state and not a country. Moreover, Toronto is a city where Sri Lankan Tamils are being settled in a considerable amount only. Let the Toronto based Tamils decide their future if such needs arises!<br />
If Toronto could be considered or to form a Little Eelam in Canada, why Tamils of Sri Lanka cannot consider same in a Sri Lanka. In addition, If Tamil Nadu being a state of Tamils, why can’t they consider for such model for Tamils in Sri Lanka?<br />
It does not mean I am  advocating  separatism or division. If Singhalese have their own destiny why can’t the Tamils decide theirs!  All depends on how they treat and live harmoniously with other communities.<br />
#74 Secondly , Prabhakaran is the other side of Singhalese extremism  in away, to  Sarath fonseka or “Cinthanaya” Bros. in terms of the deeds!  Further, Prabhakaran is a bitter product due to the majority’s gross violations and continued denial of rights. Due to the negligence of the majority leaders in the past our beautiful nation has gone through such ordeal and a deadlock created among the communities. Separatism cry began from all these nonsense!<br />
Leaders are fighting for their prosperity and luxuries, by pawning the innocents.  Not only Kalujaka but also and suthumenike , Naina marikkar and Thamibimuthu in the country are in constant panic due to extremism, terrorism, pogrom , genocide and bloody war. </p>
<p>Totalitarian rule won’t last for long! History will repeat one day.<br />
This is my reply to kalujaka on behalf of Rajaratnam .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shankar</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14949</link>
		<dc:creator>shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14949</guid>
		<description>to comment 102-wijeyapala

one of the best analysis i have read so far. you have in a nutshell analysed the past well and predicting the future too, quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to comment 102-wijeyapala</p>
<p>one of the best analysis i have read so far. you have in a nutshell analysed the past well and predicting the future too, quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wijayapala</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14940</link>
		<dc:creator>wijayapala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14940</guid>
		<description>Dear Don,

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Your argument is, Tamils were brutalised and therefore armed struggle is justified. In that case why haven’t the other minorities like the Burgers, Malay’s, Muslims and Estate Tamils taken up to terror? How did it start with the comparatively well off Jaffna Tamils?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

UGK is correct that Tamils- not Burghers or Muslims- faced violence from 1956 through 1983, although this violence did not occur on a regular or systematic basis.  Before 1983, most Jaffna Tamil youth were not involved in militancy.  The LTTE only had 30 members as DBS pointed out.  

The 1983 violence changed all that with the murder of thousands of Tamils and the displacement of tens of thousands more to foreign countries where they became the LTTE&#039;s financial bedrock.  As a Sinhala I have to say that I can understand the rise of the LTTE and Tamil armed struggle as the result of 1983, NOT simply due to the LTTE&#039;s ability to terrorize Tamils which came later.

Tamil armed struggle, whether justified or not by anti-Tamil violence, later degenerated into intracommunity violence where Tamils murdered Tamils.  This seems to be the part that UGK does not understand.  The Tamils today are a ruined people because of the LTTE.  They have no leaders today because the LTTE killed or silenced them all.  The LTTE arranged things so that if it were to fall, it would drag the rest of the Tamils too.

Today the government appears to be adopting LTTE-like mannerisms and Mahinda is becoming elevated to &quot;Thalaivar&quot; status.  Anyone criticizing the Rajapakses is a traitor.  If things don&#039;t change then we&#039;ll end up the same as the Tamils, and we won&#039;t have anyone to blame but ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Don,</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Your argument is, Tamils were brutalised and therefore armed struggle is justified. In that case why haven’t the other minorities like the Burgers, Malay’s, Muslims and Estate Tamils taken up to terror? How did it start with the comparatively well off Jaffna Tamils?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>UGK is correct that Tamils- not Burghers or Muslims- faced violence from 1956 through 1983, although this violence did not occur on a regular or systematic basis.  Before 1983, most Jaffna Tamil youth were not involved in militancy.  The LTTE only had 30 members as DBS pointed out.  </p>
<p>The 1983 violence changed all that with the murder of thousands of Tamils and the displacement of tens of thousands more to foreign countries where they became the LTTE&#8217;s financial bedrock.  As a Sinhala I have to say that I can understand the rise of the LTTE and Tamil armed struggle as the result of 1983, NOT simply due to the LTTE&#8217;s ability to terrorize Tamils which came later.</p>
<p>Tamil armed struggle, whether justified or not by anti-Tamil violence, later degenerated into intracommunity violence where Tamils murdered Tamils.  This seems to be the part that UGK does not understand.  The Tamils today are a ruined people because of the LTTE.  They have no leaders today because the LTTE killed or silenced them all.  The LTTE arranged things so that if it were to fall, it would drag the rest of the Tamils too.</p>
<p>Today the government appears to be adopting LTTE-like mannerisms and Mahinda is becoming elevated to &#8220;Thalaivar&#8221; status.  Anyone criticizing the Rajapakses is a traitor.  If things don&#8217;t change then we&#8217;ll end up the same as the Tamils, and we won&#8217;t have anyone to blame but ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaluyaka</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14909</link>
		<dc:creator>kaluyaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>98 Bose

You want to know whether 74 and 76 (K. Rajaratnam)
is K M P Rajaratna.  

Do you know about K M P Rajaratna ?.  He was one of the
extreme racist Sinhala politicians we ever had.  He was the
MP for Welimada seat, and if I can remember well, he 
belonged to MEP political party.  

I would not like to repeat here what he used to say at
public meetings about Tamils.  It was that bad.
However, some people at that time were so naive
and racist, they applauded him   

I wonder whether DBSJ remember or knows what
he used to say at public meetings.  

K M P Rajaratna belongs to the same category as
Cyril Mathew.  Both these guys fuelled racism in SL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>98 Bose</p>
<p>You want to know whether 74 and 76 (K. Rajaratnam)<br />
is K M P Rajaratna.  </p>
<p>Do you know about K M P Rajaratna ?.  He was one of the<br />
extreme racist Sinhala politicians we ever had.  He was the<br />
MP for Welimada seat, and if I can remember well, he<br />
belonged to MEP political party.  </p>
<p>I would not like to repeat here what he used to say at<br />
public meetings about Tamils.  It was that bad.<br />
However, some people at that time were so naive<br />
and racist, they applauded him   </p>
<p>I wonder whether DBSJ remember or knows what<br />
he used to say at public meetings.  </p>
<p>K M P Rajaratna belongs to the same category as<br />
Cyril Mathew.  Both these guys fuelled racism in SL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14907</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14907</guid>
		<description>94. UGK…  You say Tamils were murdered and brutalised from 1950 onwards. Well I lived in many Tamil areas and how come I never saw that? But I can say they were discriminated to some degree. Friend, you are telling this propaganda story to the wrong man. Your argument is, Tamils were brutalised and therefore armed struggle is justified. In that case why haven’t the other minorities like the Burgers, Malay’s, Muslims and Estate Tamils taken up to terror? How did it start with the comparatively well off Jaffna Tamils? Do you know where this armed struggle has now led the Tamils to? If you have any friends or relations in IDP camps just as I have, you will know the suffering that the great Tamil liberation movement has created for those poor people. All the while, LTTE front line leaders at the end of the war were trying to negotiate safe passage thru KP. They were hiding behind the skirts of the very women and children they promised to protect. If you still think armed struggle is still justified, please get to the front and start Elam war 5. No need to preach the gospel. Secondly LTTE and JVP(in 1971) are terror outfits. They believed in killing to achieve their ends. The only solution adopted throughout the world is to kill them. Because terror and killing is the only medicine they understand. That is why Hitler,Polpot,Top,Saddam,Bader-Mintof,Red brigades etc were all killed. Vp &amp; LTTE would never have come to a negotiated settlement although there were many opportunities because they believed in killing to achieve their ends. Even DBS wrote about these lost opportunities for negotiated settlement. LTTE did NOT gain support from all Tamils but they terrorised them to submission. Finally in these responses, try to meet logic with logic and not slander people. You can call me a nut and I am not annoyed but that is a similar response to what LTTE adopted. Logic of the sensible Tamils who pointed out facts and differed with them were either killed or assaulted as what happened to DBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>94. UGK…  You say Tamils were murdered and brutalised from 1950 onwards. Well I lived in many Tamil areas and how come I never saw that? But I can say they were discriminated to some degree. Friend, you are telling this propaganda story to the wrong man. Your argument is, Tamils were brutalised and therefore armed struggle is justified. In that case why haven’t the other minorities like the Burgers, Malay’s, Muslims and Estate Tamils taken up to terror? How did it start with the comparatively well off Jaffna Tamils? Do you know where this armed struggle has now led the Tamils to? If you have any friends or relations in IDP camps just as I have, you will know the suffering that the great Tamil liberation movement has created for those poor people. All the while, LTTE front line leaders at the end of the war were trying to negotiate safe passage thru KP. They were hiding behind the skirts of the very women and children they promised to protect. If you still think armed struggle is still justified, please get to the front and start Elam war 5. No need to preach the gospel. Secondly LTTE and JVP(in 1971) are terror outfits. They believed in killing to achieve their ends. The only solution adopted throughout the world is to kill them. Because terror and killing is the only medicine they understand. That is why Hitler,Polpot,Top,Saddam,Bader-Mintof,Red brigades etc were all killed. Vp &amp; LTTE would never have come to a negotiated settlement although there were many opportunities because they believed in killing to achieve their ends. Even DBS wrote about these lost opportunities for negotiated settlement. LTTE did NOT gain support from all Tamils but they terrorised them to submission. Finally in these responses, try to meet logic with logic and not slander people. You can call me a nut and I am not annoyed but that is a similar response to what LTTE adopted. Logic of the sensible Tamils who pointed out facts and differed with them were either killed or assaulted as what happened to DBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blacker</title>
		<link>http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/1149#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=1149#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>Ugk, never mind the planets, which article are you reading? This piece is about the Armed Forces, not the LTTE. Atrocities by Tamil militant groups have been addressed in DBSJ&#039;s most recent piece.

If by pointing out the greater problem of large scale sexual abuse of women and children (of all races) in Sri Lanka, I am thereby trivializing the rape of Tamils, then yes, I am guilty. However, if you are so narrow-minded as to think that the rape of Tamils is somehow more important than the rape of other women and children, then you may decide for yourself what that makes you -- it&#039;s pretty clear to me.

My point is that it&#039;s very easy to point to the Army, or the TMVP, or the LTTE and make them scapegoats, but that fails to address the root cause. Remember, it is our own society that created all three of the aforementioned entities. They are us, and not aliens from another planet.

This does not absolve those criminal individuals of guilt -- they must be brought to justice. Butt it is downright stupid to blame the organization these people belong to if you are unwilling to blame the society they are drawn from.

Many of you are criticizing and attacking me without understanding the difference between rationalizing and excusing. We rationalize criminal behaviour in order to understand it and prevent it in the future. It&#039;s quite different to excusing it.

First understand what you are arguing about before you hit that keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugk, never mind the planets, which article are you reading? This piece is about the Armed Forces, not the LTTE. Atrocities by Tamil militant groups have been addressed in DBSJ&#8217;s most recent piece.</p>
<p>If by pointing out the greater problem of large scale sexual abuse of women and children (of all races) in Sri Lanka, I am thereby trivializing the rape of Tamils, then yes, I am guilty. However, if you are so narrow-minded as to think that the rape of Tamils is somehow more important than the rape of other women and children, then you may decide for yourself what that makes you &#8212; it&#8217;s pretty clear to me.</p>
<p>My point is that it&#8217;s very easy to point to the Army, or the TMVP, or the LTTE and make them scapegoats, but that fails to address the root cause. Remember, it is our own society that created all three of the aforementioned entities. They are us, and not aliens from another planet.</p>
<p>This does not absolve those criminal individuals of guilt &#8212; they must be brought to justice. Butt it is downright stupid to blame the organization these people belong to if you are unwilling to blame the society they are drawn from.</p>
<p>Many of you are criticizing and attacking me without understanding the difference between rationalizing and excusing. We rationalize criminal behaviour in order to understand it and prevent it in the future. It&#8217;s quite different to excusing it.</p>
<p>First understand what you are arguing about before you hit that keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.341 seconds -->

